This week, W/A Senior Vice President and Co-Director of Research David DeSchryver is taking over for Ben.

I’m tapping this out en route back from SXSW EDU, where I had the honor of presenting with Edunomics Lab Director and W/A Sr. Advisor Dr. Marguerite Roza about the state of school finance and what’s likely ahead for K-12. 

The room was full and energetic, but more cautious than optimistic after a tumultuous year of funding freezes, grant cancellations, and litigation. (Great White’s 80s hit “Once Bitten Twice Shy” applies and I’ll keep referencing it until conditions change or the eye rolls become too much.)

But how shy? Where are we in 2026 compared to 2025? Today, I’m looking back on the top 5 events of the first year of Trump’s second term and ranking their severity and staying power for the K-12 market. I pull this from a longer, geekier list of events shaping the market today. If you want to learn more about that or think other events should be on the top five, get in touch. I look forward to the reactions. 

1. OMB Formula Fund Withholding — July 2025.
The unexpected stomach punch. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) delayed $6.2 billion in expected July 1 formula fund releases—including Title II-A, III-A, IV-A, IV-B, and WIOA Adult Education—citing alignment with presidential priorities. Districts that had already committed to staffing and summer programming faced immediate cash-flow shortfalls. Funds were eventually released, but the precedent of mid-cycle formula funding freezes altered planning assumptions. Congress has since addressed OMB’s ability to do that again (more below), but this was a trust-crusher for local CFOs trying to plan out the next few years, and it's going to take time to recover. 

2. ESSER Liquidation Freeze & Two-Tiered Reinstatement.

Secretary McMahon voided ESSER liquidation extensions on March 28, 2025, freezing more than $3 billion in COVID-19 relief reimbursements before a court order partially reversed the action. States that sued were excluded from "project-specific" extensions, creating a two-tiered reimbursement system (red and blue). Districts planning ESSER-funded purchases faced unexpected cash-flow gaps and uncertainty about whether reimbursements would materialize. ED eventually released the funding, but it caused concern about other prior funding agreements with the agency. 

3. January 2025 OMB Discretionary Grant Freeze.
OMB Memo M-25-13 directed all agencies to pause discretionary grants pending review for alignment with executive orders on DEI, immigration, and gender policy. Although formula programs were nominally exempted, the freeze injected deep uncertainty into competitive grant pipelines and signaled that grant awards already made could be revisited. In the end, courts threw this out, but the episode made it clear that grant oversight management was a tool that the administration would use in support of its objectives, a strategy that’s playing out in 2026, as we have noted earlier

4. ED Structural Disruption: Layoffs, OCR Backlog & Interagency Transfers.
Mass layoffs gutted ED's program and compliance capacity—IES lost 100+ staff, OCR built a backlog of 25,000 unresolved cases, and the Office of Educational Technology was shuttered. Interagency agreements have begun to transfer CTE, Title I and other programs to the Department of Labor, creating ambiguity about which agency governs what. But all throughout, there's never been a concern about the amount of funding and the timing of the funds. So, while there has been disruption in the support at the state level and some local level, the predictability of these funding streams has not been affected.

5. FY2026 Appropriations — Congress Holds the Line.
The February 2026 Consolidated Appropriations Act preserved core formula funding—Title I at $18.4 billion, IDEA at $14.2 billion—rejecting the administration's proposed $11.8 billion cut and the House proposal to eliminate Title II-A and III-A. The bipartisan vote signals Congressional resistance to deep structural cuts, and OMB interpretations about what Congress meant to allocate and when. The bill does not constrain the administration's interagency transfer authority, but it sends a clear signal that Congress expects the funds to arrive in full and on time in 2026. 

So, where are we as of March 2026?
Despite an extraordinary year, most federal dollars ultimately came through. Congress pushed back on OMB, and the FY2026 appropriations process set clearer guardrails. With the worst of the federal drama likely behind us, school leaders may (I hope) shift their attention to harder, slower-moving challenges: declining birth rates, flat enrollments, and the unforgiving arithmetic of rising costs against marginal revenue growth.

In this week’s edition, we round up the “Top 10 Articles of the Week” and take a closer look at:

  • Cybersecurity Breaches are the ‘New Normal’ for K-12

  • Join Us March 18: AI’s Opportunity to Transform Student Engagement

  • States Sue to Block the Expanded Collection of College Admissions Data

  • The Case for Expanding Multilingual Education with EnGen’s Katie Brown

Top 10 Articles of the Week from W/A’s What We’re Reading Newsletter

What We’re Reading: PK-12 and Higher Education

What We’re Reading: PK-12 and Higher Education

Receive a roundup of the latest early childhood, K-12, and higher education news. Published four times a week, this newsletter provides a curated selection of reports, research, and top stories fro...

Cybersecurity Breaches are the ‘New Normal’ for K-12

This week, Clever released its annual Cybersecure report, which found that in 2025, more than half (52%) of U.S. school districts experienced a cybersecurity incident—representing a 16-percentage-point increase year-over-year. 

The report, co-authored by W/A's own Evo Popoff and Daimen Sagastume, draws on a Q4 2025 survey from over 500 U.S. district technology and security leaders.

Key Findings

  • The Identity Gap That Still Hasn't Closed: Student identity protection remains the sector's most conspicuous vulnerability. Student identity theft and associated long-term harm is now the #1 concern for more than half of district leaders, yet students remain the least-protected population in the system. While 93% of teachers and 97% of IT staff have adopted multi-factor authentication (MFA), student MFA coverage sits at just about 13% across all grade levels—a figure that has barely moved despite rapidly intensifying threats. Closing that gap, the report argues, requires solutions built for how students actually learn, not adult workflows retrofitted onto classrooms.

  • Vendor Breaches and AI Risk Compound the Challenge: Third-party incidents are also accelerating, rising from 4% of reported breaches in 2023 to 32% in 2025, an almost eightfold increase that reflects how deeply districts now depend on a small number of shared platforms. The 2024 PowerSchool breach illustrates this challenge, with a single compromise exposing sensitive data across hundreds of districts at once. At the same time, 4 in 5 school districts believe AI is increasing their cybersecurity risk, yet only 11% have formal processes to vet AI use in edtech tools.

  • Capacity, Not Awareness, Is the Core Constraint: Perhaps the most important throughline in this year's report: the problem isn't that district leaders don't understand the risks. 66% of respondents reported that leadership support is among the least challenging aspects of their cybersecurity work. The binding constraint is capacity: staffing shortages, budget limitations, and tool complexity make it difficult to translate awareness into sustained action. Cyber insurance mandates are nudging districts toward stronger controls, but 58% of districts that adopted new technology to meet those requirements aren't sure whether it meaningfully improved their security posture.

For years, adaptive learning promised high-quality, hyper-personalized education at scale—but the technology struggled to deliver on that vision. Today, advances in AI are reopening the conversation. 

On March 18 at 2 p.m. ET, you’re invited to join an intimate conversation with institutional leaders and course design experts on what this next wave of adaptive learning looks like in practice.

What We’ll Explore

  • How advances in AI are reshaping adaptive learning and student engagement compared with earlier generations of the technology.

  • Real-world examples of how institutions and course design leaders are using AI-powered tools and simulations in teaching and learning.

  • Practical strategies and guardrails for adopting AI-driven adaptive learning while ensuring quality, equity, and strong faculty leadership.

  • Mark Milliron, President and CEO, National University

  • Dr. Lisa McIntyre-Hite, Executive Vice President and COO, Competency-Based Education Network

  • Dr. Matt Bergman, President and Founder, Center for Academic Innovation

  • Dr. Shannon McCarty, Vice President of Learning and Instruction, Calbright College 

  • Phill Miller, CEO, Skillwell

  • Moderator: Noah Sudow, Senior Vice President, Whiteboard Advisors

This message is brought to you by Skillwell.

States Sue to Block the Expanded Collection of College Admissions Data

This week, Democratic attorneys general from 17 states filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s expansion of college admissions data collection for the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS). The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, and involves Massachusetts, California, Maryland, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.

The plaintiffs argue that the “scope, breadth, and rushed process” of implementing the new reporting requirements harms institutions. Even with limited guidance from the Education Department and an unusually fast turnaround, institutions face potentially severe consequences for noncompliance, including potential loss of federal funding.

The plaintiffs also claim that the Trump administration is attempting to unlawfully transform the nonpartisan National Center for Education Statistics into a “mechanism for law enforcement and the furthering of partisan policy aims.”

Education Department Press Secretary Ellen Keast defended the new requirements: “American taxpayers invest over $100 billion into higher education each year and deserve transparency on how their dollars are being spent. The Department’s efforts will expand an existing transparency tool to show how universities are taking race into consideration in admissions. What exactly are State AGs trying to shield universities from?” [POLITICO Pro, subscription model]

Catch Up Quick

Hosted by ISTE+ASCD and Whiteboard Advisors, the Solutions Summit is a one-day, exclusive event that convenes leaders from across the education ecosystem. This year’s Summit will be held on Sunday, June 28, 2026, from 9 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. and will feature a mix of interactive panels and small-group activities focused on real-world decision-making, product impact, and the future of learning.

Language barriers are one of the most persistent challenges in the modern workplace—and one of the most overlooked.

This week, W/A’s Matt Tower sat down with Katie Brown and Sonali Joshi to discuss EnGen's acquisition of Cell-Ed, Inc. Together, they're helping employees connect across language barriers by building practical, workplace-relevant English fluency and teaching English-speaking colleagues enough of their coworkers' native languages to bridge the gap from both sides.

  • Dr. Jeff Strohl announced plans to retire as director of the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce (CEW); CEW has since launched a national search for his successor.

Check out W/A Jobs, which features 3,652 career opportunities from 314 organizations across the education industry. A few roles that caught our eye over the past week:

Upcoming Events and Convenings

Keep Reading